Does Joe Biden need a new war?

The current dominant system or US establishment would use the invisible dictatorship of compulsive consumerism of material goods to nullify the ideals of the primordial individual and transform him into an uncritical, fearful and conformist being who will inevitably swell the ranks of a homogeneous, uniform and easily manipulated society through mass manipulation techniques, having as a pillar of its political system the successive alternation in power of the Democratic Party and the Republican Party (both engulfed by the Jewish lobby). The surprise victory of Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton represented for Israel “losing a valuable friend to win a better friend”, Donald Trump, the AIPAC cover but after the chaos established by Donald Trump in the final stage of his mandate, Joe Biden It could be forced to declare a new war in the Middle East with the double objective of drying up China's energy sources as well as diluting the stigma of division in American society.

USA, vassal of Israel?

The assassination of Kennedy had as collateral damage the birth of a political system protected by the "Power in the shadow", since then all successive US Presidents-elect have been held hostage, according to the confession made by Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon at the time. Foreign Minister Shimon Peres in October 2001: "We, the Jewish people, control the United States and the Americans know it," having as a source the Israeli radio "Kol Israel", using pressure lobbies among which the American Israel would stand out. Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). The AIPAC would be the most influential pro-Israel pressure group in the United States as it has more than 100,000 members (150 of them dedicated exclusively to pressuring Congress, the White House and all administrative bodies in making political decisions that may affect to the interests of the State of Israel) and although it has always been believed that AIPAC would be a "virtual government" that would remotely direct US foreign policy based on Israeli interests, the reality would be that the pro-Israel lobby has real weight in the realms of power because the US and Israel have almost always shared identical geopolitical interests since the founding of the State of Israel in 1948. Thus, the US would count on Israel to keep the Arab states of the Middle East under constant threat of attack, (while ensuring that they remain subservient to Washington) and Israel could not continue to exist in its current form without strong support. political and material it receives from the US (about 3.8 billion dollars a year in military aid). However, during Obama's second term, we witnessed the staging of an Israeli-US “disagreement in forms” due to the prevailing geopolitical concept in the Obama Administration and whose brain would be President Carter's former National Security Adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski. Thus, Brzezinski in a speech before the Iranian-American National Council (NIAC), stated that "I believe that the US has the right to decide its own national security policy and not follow what the Israelis do like a stupid mule." In addition, Brzezinski would be at odds with the US Republican and Jewish neocon lobbies and with his usual scathing would have discredited the geostrategic myopia of both pressure groups by stating that “they are so obsessed with Israel, the Persian Gulf, Iraq and Iran that they have lost from a perspective of the global picture: the true power in the world is Russia and China, the only countries with a real capacity to resist the United States and England and on which they should focus their attention ”.

Joe Biden, the new AIPAC cover?

Theodor Herzl is considered the Father of the current State of Israel and founder of Zionism and in his book "The Jewish State: An Essay for a Modern Solution of the Jewish Question", he proposed the creation of an independent and sovereign Jewish State for all Jews of the world while promoting the creation of the WSO (World Zionist Organization) and in his work "The Old New Earth" (1902), lays the foundations of the current Jewish State as a utopia of a modern, democratic and prosperous nation in which it projected the Jewish people within the context of seeking rights for stateless national minorities of the time, such as Armenians and Arabs. However, aurora-israel.co/il denounces that “the isolationist policy of the Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, seems to be at the opposite end of the founders of Zionism, such as Teodoro Herzl and Chaim Weizmman, who included the movement within the spectrum progressive in the field of diplomacy, so the question is whether Israel's diplomatic isolation can be dangerously reversed with a policy that is contrary to immobility and confinement ”.

The Netanyahu Government aspires to resurrect the endemism of Greater Israel (Eretz Israel), an entity that would try to combine the antithetical concepts of the atavism of Greater Israel (Eretz Israel), which would drink from the sources of Genesis 15:18, which states that “it 4,000 years ago, the title of ownership of all the land between the Nile River of Egypt and the Euphrates River was bequeathed to the Hebrew patriarch Abraham and later transferred to his descendants ", a doctrine that would have Isaac Shamir as its main champion when defending that" Judea and Samaria (Biblical terms for today's West Bank) are an integral part of the land of Israel. They have not been captured nor are they going to be returned to anyone ”. The current postulates of the Likud party led by Netanyahu would be based on this doctrine, who aspires to turn Jerusalem into the “indivisible capital of the new Israel”, after the invasion of its eastern part after the Six-Day War (1967), so the Trump Administration brought the US Embassy to Jerusalem, which led to a new Palestinian intifada and the rejection of the international community, not being ruled out that Biden is once again the cover of AIPAC.

Does Joe Biden need a new war?

Iran acquired a dimension of regional power thanks to the erratic policy of the United States in Iraq, (fruit of the political myopia of the Busch Administration obsessed with the Axis of Evil) when eliminating its ideological rivals, the radical Sunni Taliban and Saddam Hussein with the subsequent power vacuum in the area, for which he has reaffirmed his inalienable right to nuclearization, but after the election of Hasan Rowhani as the new elected President of Iran, a new scenario and an opportunity for the resolution of the US nuclear dispute opened. Israel-Iran. Thus, it would be feasible to resume the 2010 energy cooperation agreement between Iraq, Iran and Syria for the construction of the South Pars to Homms gas pipeline that would connect the Persian Gulf with the Mediterranean Sea and would allow the arrival of Iranian gas to the European Union, relativizing He passed the strategic importance of Turkey within the Trans-Adriatic Gas Pipeline Project (TAP) as well as the relevant role of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates as suppliers of crude to the West, an attempt that will be torpedoed by Turkey, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Israel. However, the US Congress and Senate approved a statement prepared by Republican Senator Lindsey Graham and Democrat Robert Menéndez that emphatically pointed out that “if Israel is forced to defend itself and take action (against Iran), the US will be at their command. side to support it militarily and diplomatically ”, which will lead to increased pressure from the pro-Israel lobby of the US (AIPAC) to proceed to destabilize Iran by expeditious methods. To this end, the US Senate unanimously renewed the Iran Sanctions Act (ISA) until 2026 and after the launch of a new ballistic missile by Iran, Trump expanded sanctions against several companies. Iranians related to ballistic missiles without violating the Nuclear Agreement signed between the G + 5 and Iran in 2015 known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), an agreement that the Trump Administration abandoned and that will have as collateral effects the strangulation of Iranian crude exports and its entry into Putin's orbit of influence. However, all this would be simple fireworks to distract attention from the Machiavellian Plan outlined by the Anglo-Jewish Alliance in 1960 since Syria, Libya and Iraq would be just the bait of the Anglo-Jewish plan to attract both Russia and China and provoke a great regional conflict that will mark the future of the area in the coming years and that would be a new local episode that would be framed in the return to the recurrent endemism of the US-Russia Cold War. Thus, according to a report by the Veterans Today portal, "Israel is moving air defense weapons, long-range artillery, helicopters and F-15 fighter jets to Erbil, capital of Iraqi Kurdistan for a broader war against Iraq and Iran" while the Presidents of Iran and Turkey, Rohani and Erdogan threatened to take "stronger measures" to prevent the new Kurdistan from becoming Israel's aircraft carrier in an upcoming war against the Shiite governments of Iraq and Iran. . This conflict will involve both superpowers (USA and Russia), counting as necessary collaborators the regional powers (Israel, Syria, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Iran), covering the geographical space that extends from the Mediterranean arc (Libya, Syria and Lebanon) to Yemen and Somalia and having Iraq as the epicenter (recalling the Vietnam War with Lindon B. Johnson in 1963-1969).